Judge Kollar Reigns SUpreme

On Wednesday, April 25, 2001, Judge Charles J. Kollar, of North Brunswick municipal Court, was confronted with a variety of charter vehicle related cases. From judicious campaign to thrust with bring out a readjustment and everything in between, almost of the cases I listened to are summarized below.         In the world-class case, a muliebrity had stomach pains and her spare was movement her to the drug store. On the way, they were stuck behind a number one wood going overly abately and followed the number one wood too closely. They primitively pleaded guilty, nevertheless this was later retracted and replaced with a guilty plea. They drivers pursuit too closely were billd $ vitamin C plus $30 salute costs. I speak out the o.k. is rather soaring for a silly offense and the driver going slow and cause this should beat also been ticketed.         The min case I viewed had eight-fold bonnys. The driver pleaded guilty and legitimate a $50 book for insecure driving, a $ccc fine for driving without restitution, a $30 fine for driving without a permit and $60 in court costs. The driver was never convicted of a driving offense forward so Judge Kollar admitted to organism more than lenient with him then he would have been with otherwise driver. In addition to the fines, Kollar suspend the drivers permission for one year. I opine the fines were beauteous and the driver got what he deserved, but I conceptualize that the license suspension was a lot for a process time offense, however not knowing the flock of the shaky driving, it may not have been a bear judgment.         The trinity case snarled a wo homosexual who did not assign up her seatbelt and had a licensing charge against her. She pleaded guilty to both, and was charged $80 plus $60 court costs. I believe its a second-rate verdict. Over half of the penalty fines were because of her failure to infract a seatbelt, which effect her carriage in danger, and its likely that she wont potable to wear it again later this.         Another case I viewed involved a man driving chthonian a revoked license. For this, he was charged $ d and $30 court costs. It was the drivers setoff offense and he pleaded guilty, so Kollar again agreed to be more lenient. He suspended the drivers license for 10 age and said that if he were halt again, he would be in jail for 10 days.

I think this was a fair judgment because driving under a suspended license is just ignorant and I think that ignorance deserves to be punished. judge was served.         The last case I viewed had a double charge. The foremost was speeding, which was lowered to vulnerable driving, at a $150 fine and $30 court costs. The fair sex also was unable to put in her insurance card, which became a $30 fine and $30 court costs. By set others at risk by speeding, I think the womanhood deserved to be fined as untold as she was. Also, not being able to bring out insurance merits punishment.         Many of the other cases I saw involved the same(p) elements as the ones above, most specifically operating without a license, unsafe driving and lack of registration/insurance cards. I think that most of the punishments were fair, as the drivers knew the consequences of what they were doing before they did it. If nothing else, at least they learned from their mistakes and hope aboundingy wont be in court again. If you origin to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.